Research services

Humanitarian and Development Research

Research supporting understanding of needs, priorities, aid access, response quality, recovery, resilience, and program outcomes.

When is this service appropriate?

Research supporting understanding of needs, priorities, aid access, response quality, recovery, resilience, and program outcomes.

  • Assess multisector needs.
  • Understand affected people’s experience, access, and barriers.
  • Establish baselines or track changing conditions.
  • Study relevance, equity, and accountability.
  • Support program or recovery-strategy design.

What may the work include?

  • Surveys of households, communities, or service providers.
  • Interviews, focus groups, and feedback mechanisms.
  • Needs, services, and risk analysis.
  • Document and operational-data review.
  • Rapid or repeated monitoring.
  • Protection and access research with heightened safeguards.

Possible designs and methods

  • Rapid design with explicit limits.
  • Multistage or purposive samples for rare groups.
  • Remote monitoring where access is impossible.
  • Participatory methods that do not transfer burden to participants.
  • Integration of operational data with people’s accounts.

Sampling and access

The study population, unit of analysis, and access frame are defined before implementation. Sampling is selected according to purpose, inference needs, resources, and risk. “Representative” is used only where the design supports it, and exclusions, nonresponse, and adjustments are documented.

Quality and ethics

  • Review the question and instrument before fieldwork.
  • Pilot or pretest where the assignment permits.
  • Train researchers and standardize instructions.
  • Monitor completion and apply consistency, duration, and location checks where appropriate.
  • Use clear consent, voluntary participation, and harm minimization.
  • Separate identifying information and restrict access.
  • Document deviations, problems, and corrective action.

Possible deliverables

  • Needs or access report.
  • Priority and gap profile.
  • Monitoring dashboard or periodic brief.
  • Complaint and participant-experience analysis.
  • Design, implementation, and accountability recommendations.

Limitations and responsible interpretation

  • Do not collect information that cannot be protected or usefully applied.
  • Participation must not be understood as a promise of assistance.
  • Person-level lists are not shared without clear purpose and rights.
  • Trauma, risk, and safe referral needs are considered.
  • Findings are interpreted in light of displacement, access constraints, and population change.

Starting the assignment

Work begins with the question, intended audience, decision to be supported, relevant areas and groups, schedule, and budget. The Center then proposes a feasible scope, methodology, and deliverables.

Submit a Research Request

Questions the service can address

  • What needs are most urgent and who is not reached?
  • How appropriate, timely, and adequate is assistance?
  • How are protection and coping capacity changing?
  • What intended and unintended effects result from an intervention?
  • What should change in design, targeting, or delivery?

Inception and design document

An inception discussion confirms purpose, questions, population, geography, users, deliverables, and constraints. An inception note or protocol may define design, roles, schedule, quality plan, risk, and change rules before implementation.

Specialized considerations

  • Coordinate to avoid duplicative assessment and community fatigue.
  • Separate research from aid eligibility and avoid implying participation is required.
  • Handle protection and violence disclosures safely.
  • Update frames under displacement and rapid movement.
  • Show uncertainty where conditions change during collection.

Instrument development and testing

  • Review concepts and definitions before item wording.
  • Use language appropriate to context and collection mode.
  • Review translation for meaning rather than literal equivalence alone.
  • Conduct logical and technical testing and, where needed, a pilot or cognitive interviews.
  • Freeze the approved version and document subsequent changes.

Analysis plan

Tables, indicators, comparisons, quotations, and qualitative themes are defined before collection closes where possible. Descriptive, exploratory, and explanatory analysis are distinguished, and small cells, missing values, weights, multiple tests, and uncertainty are reviewed.

Commissioner review

The commissioner may review factual accuracy, contextual understanding, and compliance with scope. It may not select which valid findings appear or require a correct figure or material limitation to be removed. Comments and changes affecting method or meaning are recorded.

Data, ownership, and publication

The agreement defines ownership of instruments, data, code, reports, and publication rights. Identifiable or restricted data are shared only for a defined purpose under clear authority and safeguards. Delivery of a report does not by itself authorize redistribution of the original dataset.

Related services

Data Collection and Fieldwork Management · Data Analysis and Reporting · Methodological Advisory